Bitcoin ETFs on Apr 14: 1D Net Flow Falls 3,539 BTC
An unconfirmed Telegram headline at https://t.me/Bitcoin_Magazine/22992 said Bitcoin ETF net flows April 14 showed a 1-day move of -3,539 BTC and a 7-day move of +508 BTC, but the directly accessible Farside tables at https://farside.co.uk/bitcoin-etf-flow-all-data/ and https://farside.co.uk/ethereum-etf-flow-all-data/ still showed blank April 14 rows when the research check was done on April 14, 2026.
What the public tables actually confirm
The clearest reproducible data point is Farside’s US spot Bitcoin ETF table, which showed a combined ($291.0M) net outflow for April 13, 2026.
Inside the same Bitcoin ETF table, BlackRock’s IBIT added $34.7 million while Fidelity’s FBTC lost $229.2 million, making FBTC the biggest drag in the basket that day.
Farside’s US spot Ethereum ETF table showed a combined $9.5 million net inflow for April 13, 2026. That split across ETHA at -$4.1 million, ETHB at +$5.8 million, FETH at +$3.9 million, ETHE at -$1.3 million, and Grayscale’s ETH at +$5.2 million.
That verified April 13 split, Bitcoin ETFs in outflow and Ethereum ETFs still slightly positive, is the defensible version of the story. Readers who followed TrustsCrypto’s coverage of Ethereum gaining on Bitcoin can read this as another measured sign that ETF demand was mixed across assets rather than uniformly risk-off.
Why the Apr. 14 headline remains unresolved
The accessible Bitcoin ETF page and Ethereum ETF page still displayed blank Apr. 14 rows when checked, so the coin-denominated Telegram update could not be reproduced from those public tables. That reporting gap is the main investor takeaway, and it mirrors the emphasis on verifiable disclosures in TrustsCrypto’s look at recent SEC-related crypto changes.
Crypto Briefing reported on Apr. 14 that Bitcoin spot ETFs posted about $291.11 million of outflows on April 13 while Ethereum spot ETFs logged inflows. That confirms the direction of the move seen in Farside’s tables, but it still does not establish the Telegram post’s BTC-denominated 1-day and 7-day math.
FAQ
What is verified from the public ETF data?
The public Bitcoin ETF flow table verifies a combined ($291.0M) outflow on April 13, and the public Ethereum ETF flow table verifies a combined $9.5 million inflow on the same date.
Can the Telegram headline’s Bitcoin numbers be checked from those tables?
No. The accessible Apr. 14 Bitcoin ETF row was blank during the research check, and Crypto Briefing’s follow-up only confirmed an April 13 dollar outflow rather than the unconfirmed BTC-denominated totals.
Why does the Bitcoin-Ethereum split matter?
The split matters because the verified Bitcoin ETF outflow and verified Ethereum ETF inflow show institutions were not moving the two products in lockstep on April 13. That narrower conclusion is stronger than repeating a headline figure that the public tables did not yet expose.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making any investment decisions.
